Pegasus
An innovative vision of Centralised Component-Driven Platform to manage all the registries Submission data with multiple access levels. A platform that cab be easy to configure & modularise.
Discover our journey from a service solution to a well curated all Registry Data Platform, that can c ustomized over the 27+ registries Health Records. Making the best with enormous data & its application across the health care system.
Pegasus is the patient data gathering & analysis platform for Multi facility practices, single facility clinicians, and registries too.
Its an organised system that uses observational study methods to collect uniform data (clinical and other) to evaluate specified outcomes for a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure, and that serves one or more predetermined scientific, clinical, or policy purposes.
Starting with the new area of the healthcare system that works with patient visits real data, Practice details, Clinician expertise, their interconnection with registries, and finally to CMS submissions. While benchmarking the health care process to enhance medical practice performance across the US
Clinicians /Hospital’s patient health record management & measured analysed product can be applied to the bigger health care system, to all Registries across the US
We started with the basics - usability and information architecture, the first steps towards digitalisation of Registry requirements
A common platform that captures data, analyses and processes to CMS submissions. Also, customise this platform as per the registry requirements and manage on their behalf too. With sorted process to help practice performance with their best capacities to simplify onboarding and enhance UI consistency
Build a cohesive platform to capture & track clinicians performance records on the basis of patient visit data, benchmark clinician performance and help them with CMS submission
A Scalable, Hybrid assistance health portal
Understanding Registry Needs
1
Lack of UX approach in the current Product
2
Long term Plan -
Realign all current features with Better dev
Short term plans -
Break Feature list a per the Dev, UX priorities
3
Base of Current requirements & related thought process
4
Ideal User Portrait & Feasible User Journey
A service offering trying to be a organized product
Single provider with no access to EHR, works manually in the Pegasus Platform to capture, add/edit patient visits data & organize related majors
Multispecialty Practice have the access to EHR, provides captured data in digital format, then Pegasus provides facility extract and uploads data in the platform
Task Analysis
We built a metrix for user flow against the all type of users, which helped us examine task performance hierarchy for each user type and leads to better navigation structure.
Environmental Profile
Hospital Desk work for most of the user using EHR on Devices. For Manual without EHR access - Document Storage room & Computer entries for data Stress level due to complex data capturing & analysis in basic tools like Excel or other preliminary tools and its direct impact on performance error
Impact on UI
Practice Admin Clinician
Practice Admin Non Clinician
Registry Admin
User Matrix
Practice Admin Clinician
Practice Admin Non Clinician
Registry Admin
Name
Age - Gender
Occupation
Data Entry Method
Practice Size
Speciality
Role
David Reynolds
42 Male
Clinician
Epic - Data Pull
Mid
General Physician
Admin
Kelly Peterson
38 Female
Support Staff
Epic - Data Push
Big
-
Admin
Noah Murphy
34 Male
Non Medical Staff
Epic - Data Pull
4
Data Entry Specialist
Main Admin
User Comments
“Their is always scope in improvement, bow we have check overall growth or lacking in patient care”
“Data entry needs to have centriized system and bess. dependant on paper work"
*It will be good to have one system which can help me with CMS entries with much more east”
Key Goals
Keep all the data categorised for patient visits & care reports
Keep all the data categorised for patient visits & care reports
Track patient visit & care reports, Keeping required data inEHR
Key Blockers
1. No timely check to improve medical staff performance resulting low CMS score
2. Low CMS score can impact more to Small practice yearly budget
Data transfer from Paper records to CMS
Measures score data complexity
Sign Up / Registration
Data Entry of Practice
Providers, Locations,
Agreement , Plan Selection,
Payment, Pull/Push
Data Entry of Technology
Pegasus Dashboard
Autofilled sections for Practice,
Providers basic details
Pull - EHR Data Entry
Pull - EHR Data Entry
Pull - EHR Data Entry
Data Analysis
for all Majors
View Analysed Data
Export Reports
Care Gap Analysis
Performance Improvement Plan
Improving Analysis
MIPs Submission to CMS
Registry 1
Registry 2
Registry 3,
Registry 4
Registry 5
Registry 1
Registry 2
Auto Filled Data
Practice, Providers,
Locations,
Role of Provider
Registry 1
Registry 2
Push / Pull
Data Entry of Technology
Registry 1
Registry 2
Data Analysis
for all Majors
Improving Analysis
View Analysed Data
Export Reports
View/ Related actions
Care Gap Analysis
Performance Improvement Plan
Registry 1
Registry 2
MIPs Submission to CMS
Information Architecture (IA)
The information architecture (IA) is not part of the on-screen user interface (UI) — rather, IA informs UI.
Looking at the waste data captured & analysed for Pegasus, we chose open card sorting to define Information Architecture which led us to strong navigational structure catering to the capabilities of each bucket
This Navigation helped users find information, related functionality and encourage them to take desirable actions. Also, separated components include global navigation, local navigation, utility navigation, breadcrumbs, filters, facets, related links, footers, fat footers, and so on.
Discover our journey from a service to a well-developed product. Requirement of over the 27+ registries patient data customized. Making the best with enormous data & its application across the health care system.
Pegasus is the patient data gathering & analysis platform for Multi facility practices, single facility clinicians, and registries too.
Our Approach for UT It’s far better to run some usability testing using what you have to hand than to run no usability testing at all.
We ran unmoderated remote testing with bunch of user segments.
User Testing 1 on Low fidelity Wireframes & Feedback
User Testing 2 on High fidelity Wireframes & Feedback
Feedback
1. Care gap gives added advantage to perform & analyse quarterly.
2. Measure consolidated matrix bar shows own performance against registry performance And many more...